Last night the auditorium San Rocco took the highly anticipated face-off between the candidates for the primary coalition of the center of Michela Francesca and Maurizio Paci Mangialardi.
The debate was moderated by journalist Maureen Socci, in a packed room that failed to contain all who wished to attend the last step of this competition internal election to the coalition. The comparison
so-called "all American" provided for the treatment of eight points that candidates have to face in the span of three minutes.
One minute his head was reserved for the reply and the rejoinder.
Both candidates were visibly excited at the beginning of the debate, then over time the tension has melted and is entered on the merits of the issues addressed in the short time I have even been properly gutted.
were addressed various issues, from town to social issues, from tourism to mobility, from labor to public works, through the discussion of the primary and the future of the coalition, not all before the two candidates described their personal and political history and explained the reasons for their application.
The two candidates have addressed the points in very different ways from each other. Maurizio
Mangialardi although displaying a degree of certainty appeared very conservative and defensive.
Rather than explain his programs and plans, preferred to describe the successes and results achieved by the administration of which he was part without going into details and without a thorough examination of the issues proposed, but remains rather vague. Francesca Paci
the other hand had a more analytical approach, trying to explain in more detail the points of his opponent's joint program and how it will develop if they can prevail in the electoral competition in March.
In fact, the "duel" between the candidates went forward without major thrusts.
One of the few skirmishes came when in the field of Urban Planning candidate Francesca Paci showed that the coalition program providing for the establishment of a new plan of urban planning that will take the name of the Structural Plan and which will provide improvements and building renovations in order to clear the land consumption. The applicant has contended
Mangialardi these words of the Paci expressed misgivings about a kind of long and laborious planning judged and ill-suited to the needs of the city really needs immediate attention.
Now Francesca Paci responded by calling Mangialardi compliance program shared by all coalition forces.
Program accepted and signed by all. In the other topics
Francesca seemed to prevail by presenting large-scale projects and innovative.
concrete proposals and also for new tourism, green economy, social, seniors and working. Maurizio
Mangialardi instead was a film in my opinion have already seen that did not deliver anything new, nor from the perspective of the proposal, nor from the innovation policy.
In the final comments from the public was clear that output is Francesca Paci winner by comparison with his opponent.
From my point of view, Francesca, though starting at a disadvantage and it seemed much more convincing and prepared, let me tell you even more courageous in dealing with the thorniest issues without being plastered in defensive positions.
E 'was still a good time even if we think the three minutes of the candidates were not sufficient to fully explain such important topics.
A 'else that I think it is the ability to review by the public to ask questions or proposals to candidates.
Despite this, however, a great turnout and an evening of democracy.
A lovely evening, which saw indubbiamente emergere la preparazione e la cultura di Francesca Paci.
0 comments:
Post a Comment